difficile de comparer:"You seem to believe that AlphaZero does the same thing as Stockfish, only 1000 times faster because it used 1000 times stronger hardware. This is not true at all. It uses a very different approach and that approach is very resource intensive. In fact, during the match AlphaZero was evaluating 80 thousand positions per second while Stockfish was clocking at 70 million positions per second. Now tell me that AlphaZero won because of a stronger hardware. Of course on 64 CPU it would be slower and who knows how it would play but the point is that AlphaZero does it better, albeit at higher cost. – IA Petr Harasimovic"
mais que doit-on comparer lorsque l'on dit que l'un est meilleurs que l'autre??????
pourquoi le nombre de positions serait un critère de mieux ou moins bien???
en quoi c'est mieux d'analyser moins de position en utilisant tout plein de resources pour se faire?
Comparer quoi, donc?